RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02382
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) in her assignment
history and Officer Performance Reports (OPRs) covering 8 Jun 02
through 15 Mar 04 be changed from 34M1 to 34M3.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She had eight years of experience in the career field therefore;
she had already achieved the 34M3 or qualified level. In
support of her request, she submits the Air Force Officer
Classification Directory (AFOCD), paragraph 3.4 which states
For award of AFSC 38P3, a minimum of 24 months of experience is
mandatory.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is a Lieutenant Colonel currently serving in the
Air Force Reserves on Active Guard Reserve tour.
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are described
in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary
responsibility which is included at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPTS indicates DAFSCs are based on a members position, not
experience level in accordance with (IAW) AFI 36-2406, Officer
and Enlisted Evaluation Systems, paragraph 1.4.8 (Atch 1). The
member has not provided evidence that the position itself for
which she was assigned during the periods of the OPRs were in
fact at the qualified level of 34M3.
Furthermore, ARPC recommends disapproval of the applicants
request to correct the DAFSC on her 2003 and 2004 OPRs stating
she has not exhausted all administrative avenues. ARPC
recommends the member obtain a copy of the Unit Manning Document
(UMD) for that time period, showing that she occupied the 34M3
position. This will be used as the supporting documentation for
the DAFSC change. ARPC further recommends that the applicant
submit her request, along with the appropriate documentation to
the Evaluation Reports Appeals Board (ERAB). Upon ERAB
approval, the member will forward the updated OPRs to Career
Enhancements via the virtual Personnel Center-Guard Reserve
system with a request to update the Assignment History portion
of this request. The applicant has not provided sufficient
documentation concerning her position at the time.
The complete ARPC/DPTS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A Copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 18 Dec 14 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-02382 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Jun 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, ARPC/DPST, dated 12 Sep 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Dec 14.AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00284
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00284 INDEX CODE: 100.05 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 Aug 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered by the Calendar Year 2005 (CY05) Lieutenant Colonel (LTC) Continuation Board with a Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) of 14N4 (Intelligence) rather than...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02257
In accordance with AFI 36-2406, Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Systems, Retired or separated personnel are not eligible to apply for correction through the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB); therefore, they must apply to the AFBCMR. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01917
Her corrected records be supplementally considered by supplemental Management Level Review (MLR) boards for the CY99B and CY00A selection boards. The DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that the 19 Aug 03 supplemental MLR for the CY00A board failed in that her record alone was sent to the MLR for a promotion recommendation. DPPPE asserts that substitution of the 1999...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04510
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04510 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Retention/Retirement Year Ending (RYE) in 2002 be credited with additional retirement points to reflect a satisfactory year toward retirement. STATEMENT OF FACTS: During the RYE 11 Jun 02, the applicant was credited with five active duty points, 24 Inactive Duty Training (IDT) points, 15 membership points,...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Reports & Queries Section, AFPC/DPAPS1, reviewed this application and indicated that the reviewer for the OPR closing 31 Dec 94 signed as Commander of the USAF Air Warfare Center so “Center” is the correct duty command level for this duty entry. This OPR clearly shows that the duty title was incorrect on the OPB for the 950701 entry; therefore, DPAPS1 changed the duty title for this entry in...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05148
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05148 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter with attachments prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is insufficient evidence of an error or an...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00293
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request to correct his DAFSC on his P0510A PRF. He requests his record be corrected with the Section Commander duty title and a C prefix added to his DAFSC, followed by SSB consideration. Therefore, we are convinced that both...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03923
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03923 INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 Jun 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be afforded Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for the Calendar Year 2004B (CY04B) Lieutenant Colonel (LTC) Central Selection Board (CSB) with the Officer Selection Brief (OSB)...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01466
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01466 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: A Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be added to her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. On 27 Jul 03, the applicant was demobilized (released from active duty) and reverted to her traditional (part-time) status as a member of the Air Force Reserve. The remaining relevant facts...
The first to request promotion consideration to the grade of major, by SSB, because of the DAFSC correction on the two OPRs and, the second to request promotion consideration because of the correction in Section VII of the 15 June 1997 OPR. The Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) was correct on both the Officer Selection Brief (OSB) and Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) reviewed by the CY98B board. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are...